BreakPoint Blog

Gay 'rights' favored at expense of children and religious liberty

Catholic Charities in Washington, D.C., has ended its 80-year foster care program because of the District’s new law that will obligate all outside contractors to hire, provide benefits to, and offer adoption and foster care services to homosexuals.

Susan Gibbs, archdiocesan spokeswoman, said, “We said last fall that we could not continue this program if the bill was passed and written. Well, this has come to pass,” referring to the Catholic Charities foster care and adoption program.

The archdiocese's decision is one of the first actions in the name of religious liberty taken after the monumental Manhattan Declaration was signed by 243 religious leaders. These leaders proclaim, “We pledge to each other, and to our fellow believers, that no power on earth, be it cultural or political, will intimidate us into silence or acquiescence.”

Most Christians, including Roman Catholics, are pleased that the Catholic Church has held to its longstanding principles. While this is a victory in the face of injustice, the failure of children committed to unfit homes, some of which will be parented by couples living gravely immoral lifestyles, lies at the feet of the aggressively liberal D.C. City Council.

The D.C. City Council taking for granted the help and leadership of orthodox Christians should come as no surprise, but what is surprising is the reaction of Americans United Executive Director Rev. Barry Lynn, who said, “If faith-based charities cannot or will not obey civil rights laws, they ought not benefit from public funds.”

Whether or not gay rights are “civil rights” should be hotly debated. But what Mr. Lynn is missing here, is that Catholic Charities will not “benefit” from these public funds; the children they serve will! How asinine to act as if Catholic Charities is full of profit-seeking entrepreneurs, when it's the D.C. City Council that is compiling a nice track record of personally benefiting from public funds. Catholic Charities is not full of millionaires or ladder-climbers for a reason—they are committed to serving God’s children with biblical principles. Those biblical principles prohibit homosexual behavior (1 Cor 6:9-10; Gn 2:24; Lev 20:13; Lev 18:22; Rom 1:27; Ephesians 5:3). For a man who graces himself with the title “Reverend,” one would think that he would be a bit more steeped in the plain reading of Scripture.

Let us pray that these children find appropriate, godly homes and that the D.C. City Council reverses its decision and abandons any law that is contrary to God’s law or natural law.
  • 'Abort it and try again'

    That's Richard Dawkins' advice to any woman carrying a child with Down syndrome.READ FULL ARTICLE »
  • Bad example

    I was all set to celebrate Nicholas Kristof's column "Don't Dismiss the Humanities" ("the world would be poorer — figuratively, anyway — if we were all coding software or running companies") . . . until he went and cited Peter Singer as a great philosopher. Yes, that Peter Singer

    Personally, if I seriously thought that Singer was representative of the best and brightest that the humanities have to offer, I'd have majored in math.READ FULL ARTICLE »
  • The insider's perspective

    "It is quite hard to do a degree in English literature and believe, or try to believe, that the Bible is God’s literal word of truth," writes columnist Christina Patterson in the Guardian.

    I confess this took me aback. I always thought it would be the other way around -- that it would be hard without that belief. Obviously people do it all the time, but there are so many things in literature that I think I would have trouble grasping without that insider's perspective.READ FULL ARTICLE »
  • Who Are the Courts Protecting: Women, or the Abortion Industry?

    Recent rulings in Mississippi, Alabama, and Ohio make it hard to defend the idea that women's health is a top concern for the courts. It is easy, however, to argue that protecting the abortion industry is. Consider:

  • Pro-Choicers Are Doing Our Work for Us

    Over the past several election cycles, abortion has generally lost its prominent place in the national conversation. A sluggish economy, two wars, and the libertarian Tea Party phenomenon have combined to keep pro-life and pro-choice arguments in the background. Within the past several weeks, however, two pro-abortion articles have appeared that demand the attention of pro-lifers. The arguments of the two pieces actually contradict each other, revealing the stark divide present even within the circles of abortion rights activists. Pro-life people might seize on the paucity of both arguments to make even more compelling cases for life in general and adoption in particular.

    The first piece, the one getting the most attention, appeared in the online edition of Esquire on July 30. The article profiles the “abortion ministry” of Dr. Willie Parker of Mississippi, a state whose legislators have managed to shut down all but one of the state’s abortion clinics. There are many interesting aspects to this story, but the most relevant one occurs toward the end of the piece. READ FULL ARTICLE »
  • The only purpose of trolls

    If you're ever tempted to believe that humanity is basically good, just read about the prevalance of trolling, and it'll straighten out your theology right away.READ FULL ARTICLE »
  • A Christian view of suicide and community responsibility

    Matt Walsh wrote a piece about Robin Williams' suicide that angered a lot of people with its emphasis on suicide as a free choice. Theologist/philosopher Elizabeth Stoker Bruenig puts her finger on the reason for the outrage, and points us toward a reasonable middle ground, in a thoughtful article: READ FULL ARTICLE »
  • 'The Giver': A Q&A with Micheal Flaherty of Walden Media

    [Editor’s note: This weekend sees the release of “The Giver,” the new film based on Lois Lowry’s award-winning children’s novel set in a utopian society that turns out to be not quite so utopian. Guest blogger Ashley Chandler interviewed Micheal Flaherty, president of Walden Media and producer of the film. Note: This interview contains some spoilers.]

    Q. I read that “The Giver” was one of Walden’s first literary purchases. I’m curious to know the reasons why you made the purchase. READ FULL ARTICLE »

The Point Radio

  • It’s Still Eugenics

    Eugenics just got miniaturized. For the Chuck Colson Center for Christian Worldview, I’m John Stonestreet with The Point.

    Listen Now | Download