Sex-selective abortion, and the role of the U.S.

The other day, I linked to Jonathan V. Last's article about Mara Hvistendahl's new book on sex-selective abortion in Asia. Hvistendahl herself now has an article in Foreign Policy, detailing some of her dismaying findings (H/T Shameless Popery):
Once found only in East and South Asia, imbalanced sex ratios at birth have recently reached countries as varied as Vietnam, Albania, and Azerbaijan. The problem has fanned out across these countries, moreover, at a time when women are driving many developing economies. In India, where women have achieved political firsts still not reached in the United States, sex selection has become so intense that by 2020 an estimated 15 to 20 percent of men in northwest India will lack female counterparts. I could only explain that epidemic as the cruel sum of technological advances and lingering sexism. I did not think the story of sex selection's spread would lead, in part, to the United States.

Then I looked into it, and discovered that what I thought were right-wing conspiracy theories about the nexus of Western feminism and population control actually had some, if very distant and entirely historical, basis in truth. As it turns out, Western advisors and researchers, and Western money, were among the forces that contributed to a serious reduction in the number of women and girls in the developing world. And today feminist and reproductive-rights groups are still reeling from that legacy.
Don't miss Mark Steyn's take on Hvistendahl's reluctance to give up her pro-choice stance, even in the face of these appalling facts.


BreakPoint Blog