If you're delivering the good news of the Gospel in anger, you're far from effective. Professor of religion Theodore Pulcini has some keen insights into this horrible ploy in his Touchstone
article "
Cultivating 'Christian Anger.'"
Using St. John Cassian's "Institutes," Pulcini explores the perniciousness of anger and the catastrophes it causes.
The mark of a Christian is never to demean anyone. We should engage people with grace and when appropriate, humor. Anger, shrillness, and caustic words are the works of the Enemy of the Gospel.
Comments:
The perpetrators and victims (not all but a significant number) are seeking reconciliation.
I read the other day about four children in Mindanao who were scavenging for scrap metal to sell. They entered someone's backyard, and that man took them captive. Two of the children escaped, but an 8- and 11-year old could not. The man murdered them (possibly torturing them first), then burned their bodies.
Even if one acknowledges that the perpetrator is not right in the head, still it is surely appopriate to be angry about the murders? And even if forgiveness is extended, even that acknowledges that there has been an offense, and possibly that that offense is anger-able. (Well, if 'actionable' can be a word, why not 'angerable'?)
Furthermore, while extending forgiveness is most definitely a good witness, to me it seems that not showing anger is actually a poor witness, because it makes Christians looks as though we don't really care, that everything is just kum-ba-ya.