The other day, I found myself in the bizarre position of having some sweet, decorous Christian ladies trying to explain to me why it was okay to read
Fifty Shades of Grey. It was especially bizarre because, in my previous experience, the sweet, decorous Christian ladies are so often the ones arguing that it's unsafe to read anything more daring than Grace Livingston Hill. One said that she skips the dirty parts and reads it for the characters' mental anguish and how they work through it. Isn't that like reading
Playboy for the articles?
I'm not quite sure why this particular series seems to have convinced so many upstanding women -- Christian women included -- that reading porn is okay, or that a sadistic "hero" is worthy of their adoration and sympathy. But Karen Allen Campbell offers
some theories that I think have a lot of merit. (Note that her critique of conservative evangelicalism is an insider's critique, as she's a conservative evangelical herself.)
Also, check out
this screamingly funny takedown of the book by my friend (and
new BreakPoint feature writer) Rachel McMillan. As I've always said, sometimes the best way to fight a disturbing trend like this is simply to laugh at it. As Thomas More wrote (and C. S. Lewis quoted in
The Screwtape Letters), "The devil . . . the prowde spirite . . . cannot endure to be mocked."
Comments:
I've argued elsewhere, that books like these show how modern feminism has utterly failed to give any real meaning to young women. Human nature cannot be mocked: women are different than men, and feminism has denied God ordained complementarity. So since these young women, and maybe the millions reading these books, don't have any example of real Godly manhood, they search for it in cheap and harmful substitutes.
Way too much here to unpack in a comment, but I think it short sighted to dismiss these books as morally threatening without analyzing their cultural significance.